![]() I tested both at a reasonable ISO (1600) and the difference was bananas! I think that the image quality is far better than having IBIS. Update2: I ended up returning my GH5 because I was very disappointed regarding the ISO performance, I already knew that the GH5S would be superior on that matter but I didn’t know it was going to be a huuuuge difference. Also I put my Gh5s for sale, I will be using my Pocket 4k and my Gh5 from now on! Update: I bought the GH5, it will be arriving in 2 days and I will be updating you guys how it will behave with the Sigma 18-35. The GH5 I would be using with the Sigma 18-35. ![]() I want to know if you guys can help me out, I dont know if I buy the GH5 or the Panasonic 12-35 to get better Stabilization. so I am thinking to sell my 16-35 EF lens and get the speedbooster EF to M4/3 with Sigma 18-35 F1.8 ART. ![]() I have a problem with my micro 4/3 lens in low-light since its maximum aperture is 4. I current own a GH5S + Sigma 18-35 f1.8 but sometimes I feel that I need more stabilization for my videos since I shoot a lot of Events such as Birthdays and Weddings. And I already have Canon 5D mark iii with 24-105mm (4) and 16-35 (2.8) EF Lenses. That is if you even want a back up cam.I am wondering wich one is better regarding the Image Stabilization. Unsure the price of the t2i, but I think you could sell both and then get 2 first gen international 12-35 (I would probably get a better focal length on the GH4 for back up shots) for the price of a speedbooster and lens (because you'd have $600 from the sigma lens at that point). I would almost say one option would be to sell that 18-35 and your t2i, and update the t2i to a GH4 with a good kit lens and a cheap Panasonic lens for the GH4. I would not have went sigma if I did not have that camera (to use the lens on both cameras). Īlso, I went the sigma route because I own a Canon 80D. I hate to buy the 12-35, and the 35-100 is a little too zoomed for my taste, although I would love to test it with the dual IBS and see how well you could keep far distance subjects in frame. However, I'm still hoping Panasonic may release a higher focal zoom fixed aperture in the future. I went the sigma route and if I could test the Panasonic lens, I have a feeling I would prefer it as an overall carry lens. If that combo is out of your price range ($799 for lens and $699 for the Speedbooster) and you can only afford the 12-35, then fear not, it's a great lens. So if you're constrained by budget and can only choose 1 lens, get the Sigma 18-35. He made great use of the 12-35mm lens, but that doesn't make it better than the Sigma 18-35mm. It just shows you that it's lighting, composition, and much more than just the camera and lens in your hand. I'm sure many more inexperienced or less accomplished filmmakers using the Sigma 18-35 wouldn't be able to do what he did. That video done by Neumann is more a showcase of his skill as a filmmaker and cinematographer. However no matter who you ask, the Sigma 18-35 will be the superior lens in terms of IQ, lowlight, DOF and overall look. The 12-35 is sharp, compact and will net you great footage like the one shown in the Neumann video. Im concerned about how well it will be solid enough and the weight (but coming. Im a reporter / documentarist and I cover strikes, conflicts in foreign countries. I found some pro&cons of the GH5+Sigma 18-35mm in this sub but not a lot of feedback about documentary, run & gun experience. I have both the Sigma 18-35 + Speedbooster Ultra Combo and the 12-35mm. I still have a Canon 70-200mm+extender for long shots.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |